The two races were at war with each other before the game, and while there might have been mercenaries hired here and there, in large, the norn were non-involved, the sylvari too distant to care, and the asura made deals with both sides (just enough to not anger the other side).īut we've also had the addition of minor races, so let's look at those: What will no doubt happen would be a case of "Bangar-supporting-Blood + Renegades" versus "everyone else".īut let's go with the crazed idea that Iron, Ash, and Blood uniformly wage war on humans again. With the reduction of threats, and the prevailing issue of renegades, this may change. While Smodur and Malice both support the treaty, Bangar didn't - he just went along with it to avoid fighting the Iron and Ash legions while dealing with so many other threats. With the ghost issue having a solution in sight thanks to Rytlock, the Flame Legion nearly wiped out, and the branded a declining threat, the need for a peace treaty will reduce since the primary reason for the treaty was to reduce threats to the Iron Legion. I kind of suspect that the treaty will crumble once Kralkatorrik is dead. The wild card will be how the elder dragon problem is solved The order of whisper will split in sub factions each one supporting one faction or other but i thing the bigger part will support the humans. The priory will ignore the whole problem until someone start disrupt their excavation trying to found some lost superweapon ![]() ![]() The Vigil will try the enforce the truce with the sylvari and create safe zones for the refugees of war. The interesting thing is what will happen with the orders of tyria: Norm will do what a norm do: forge his legend, be it in the battlefield or in some other way. Sylvaris will try negotiate a truce and remain neutral. If human in central tyria have any chance of win is with the help from the other human countrys but at the moment of the hystory elona is out of play and cantha closed their borders.Īsura will sell weapons and (the inquest) take advantage of the conflict to further their onterest. Humans would fight a defensive war, they dont have resources nor the tech to make assault again the charr, their only bridge should be ebonhawk as have been seem all the time but this time charr have more advanced warmachines and we havent see any tech from the kingdom of kryta. The humans are more than capable of fighting the charr to a stand still even without the aid of other races. ![]() And who is more likely to be the aggressor? The charr. The aggressor will nearly always be seen in a worse light, whether they have 'justifications' or not. This is how international relations work. ![]() The most likely outcome is a bloody stalemate unless Ebonhawke is taken by storm with the charr taking advantage of the treaty suddenly ending and moving in before the humans have a chance to react, and that would DEFINITELY mean others would be more inclined to take humanity's side given the atrocity that would have just been committed. Ebonhawke would be the first target in a charr/human war, it would be the main point of the conflict, the flashpoint, and crucially the humans would be on the defensive and that is far more likely to breed sympathy especially given Ebonhawke's been through all that before. I'm assuming nearly everyone would support if not side with the humans to maintain the status quo as established with the treaty, as they would recognize that the charr are reneging on said treaty just because they have the opportunity to. Why exactly would the norn join the charr? Just because "they're strong"? That's not how the norn work.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |